|
APRIL FOOLS…NO SOCIAL SECURITY FOR YOU!
It’s no joke. Many Americans are beginning to realize that the Social
Security system – into which they could have paid countless thousands – may not
have all the money promised to them when it’s their turn to retire. And although
some of the specifics are disputed, it is agreed and understood across the board
that the Social Security system has serious flaws that need resolution if the
program can continue.
First, what’s the problem?
For starters, there are far more people collecting than had ever been
anticipated. In fact, one out of every six Americans currently collects a
monthly Social Security check either as a retiree, a disabled individual, or a
survivor of a recipient.
Additionally, in 1960 there were 5 workers paying taxes into Social Security
for every 1 recipient. Today, the ratio is 3.3 workers per recipient…and by the
year 2040 the ratio will dwindle down to 2 to 1.
Historically, Social Security has generally collected more in taxes than it
has paid out in benefits, and there is presently a surplus in the fund. But it
is forecast that beginning in the year 2018, benefits paid will exceed taxes
collected. It is debated how many years longer the surplus would be able to
cover the payment of full benefits in the face of a shortfall in tax payments;
some say until 2042, others say 2052. But when the surplus is gone, Social
Security recipients will only receive a reduced part of their benefits, around
75% of the promised amount unless something is done.
So is there a solution?
There are many ideas being suggested; one from the AARP includes raising the
Social Security wage base from $90,000 to $140,000 and increasing the age
requirement to 70 for full benefits…but most current workers dislike this
suggestion, as it means they will pay even more into the system and have to wait
longer to receive their benefits.
Another plan, which is being suggested by the Bush Administration, is to have
private accounts available as an alternative within the current Social Security
system. An individual employee would have the option to invest a maximum 4% of
wages (of the 12.4% currently being paid which includes the employer’s
contribution) up to $1,000 annually into a private savings account.
Projections indicate that if an individual is able to achieve a 3.0% rate of
return after inflation, then the combination of the private account plus Social
Security beats the current Social Security arrangement. The Social Security
Administration feels this rate of return should be very achievable.
One objection to this plan is the cost of a transition, which would require
additional government borrowing and increase the deficit. How to fix the
impending shortfall in Social Security promises to be an interesting debate. But
one thing is certain – that the system will eventually need a fix. If you feel
strongly as to how the Social Security issue should be addressed, write your
Congressional representative. Because just like the old commercial…if enough
people speak up, they will listen. |